

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When One Website is NOT Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-one-website-is-not-enough</link>
	<description>Topics include web design &#38; development, small creative firms, and women in business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:42:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Perhaps different sites that showcase the benefits of different aspects or branches of a company could be beneficial for promotional reasons, but I think many companies take this &lt;em&gt;way&lt;/em&gt; too far. It is intuitive to expect a central place of organization. There are many companies with horribly disorganized web sites that aren&#039;t intuitive to users. They&#039;re overgrown monstrosities, and it&#039;s hard to figure out exactly &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; they do. Too much information in one place is only a bad thing if it&#039;s overloaded and poorly organized, which I&#039;ve had to deal extensively. However, pushing your content too far apart is nothing but bad new in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps different sites that showcase the benefits of different aspects or branches of a company could be beneficial for promotional reasons, but I think many companies take this <em>way</em> too far. It is intuitive to expect a central place of organization. There are many companies with horribly disorganized web sites that aren&#8217;t intuitive to users. They&#8217;re overgrown monstrosities, and it&#8217;s hard to figure out exactly <em>what</em> they do. Too much information in one place is only a bad thing if it&#8217;s overloaded and poorly organized, which I&#8217;ve had to deal extensively. However, pushing your content too far apart is nothing but bad new in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>You may also want to pay attention to where the sites are hosted. If all of the sites are hosted on the same Class C IP address they are likely to be deemed as part of the same &#039;ownership&#039; and will not pass pagerank to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may also want to pay attention to where the sites are hosted. If all of the sites are hosted on the same Class C IP address they are likely to be deemed as part of the same &#8216;ownership&#8217; and will not pass pagerank to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Hensel</title>
		<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Hensel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>If you have several websites with separate URLs but the same content, it is DEFINITELY a red flag for the search engines. 

The only time you should have multiple sites is when they are all unique and geared at different audiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have several websites with separate URLs but the same content, it is DEFINITELY a red flag for the search engines. </p>
<p>The only time you should have multiple sites is when they are all unique and geared at different audiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akelly</title>
		<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>akelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>I heard having multiple websites is a red flag for search engines – a clear indication that you are trying occupy multiple domains with identical content. In cases like this, Google will typically penalize both domains and this could be why a website content is so poorly indexed. This could also have a negative reflection on all subdomain including your blogsite. I also noticed that each domain (with and without “www”) are treated as separate sites, so you really have to be careful on duplicate website domains.

“If a website is using 100% duplicate content then Google will penalize you in their search engine rankings and in some extreme cases even sandbox your website completely.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard having multiple websites is a red flag for search engines – a clear indication that you are trying occupy multiple domains with identical content. In cases like this, Google will typically penalize both domains and this could be why a website content is so poorly indexed. This could also have a negative reflection on all subdomain including your blogsite. I also noticed that each domain (with and without “www”) are treated as separate sites, so you really have to be careful on duplicate website domains.</p>
<p>“If a website is using 100% duplicate content then Google will penalize you in their search engine rankings and in some extreme cases even sandbox your website completely.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Quay</title>
		<link>http://www.innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Quay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innercirclemedia.com/blog/2008/12/10/when-one-website-is-not-enough/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Great article!  I&#039;ve tried two sites and learned that for my business, it is best to have just one.  I can always add a page for new offerings--which is a snap with the ICM Content Management system (yes, I still love it!)

Of course, now I&#039;m consumed with the idea of having chickens and little goats.  Where will you be keeping the ICM herd?  I need some milk for homemade chevre...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I&#8217;ve tried two sites and learned that for my business, it is best to have just one.  I can always add a page for new offerings&#8211;which is a snap with the ICM Content Management system (yes, I still love it!)</p>
<p>Of course, now I&#8217;m consumed with the idea of having chickens and little goats.  Where will you be keeping the ICM herd?  I need some milk for homemade chevre&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

